Jizya. Everybody's favourite tax |
He has been undone by his own self-aggrandisement and
attention-seeking, but the problem is that over many years he has been
involved with innumerable people who have shown themselves to be more than
simply loudmouthed blowhards. They have attempted to bring serious sectarian
conflict as well as murder to the streets of Britain. A number of
Choudary's associates were imprisoned a few years ago for
attempting a Mumbai-style attack on London landmarks, including the London
Stock Exchange. Others have been to prison for incitement and
countless terrorist-recruitment offences; and since the beginning of the Syrian
civil war, a number of his followers or supporters have gone to Syria and Iraq to join and
fight with ISIS.
Choudary himself is a trained lawyer and is sufficiently
slippery to know on just which side of the law to keep his remarks. The last
Labour government's creation of a new offence of "glorifying terror"
ought to have caught him within it, but it appeared not to have done.
Frustratingly, he has remained at large.
I wonder why. One theory is that Choudary has been, to some extent used as a "fly-trap" by the police or SO15. He is well known enough to have anyone seriously interested in the
most radical forms of Islamic extremism find their way to him. Perhaps there was some clandestine agreement to allow him to get away with what he does because it is better
for such extremism to have an observable and open meeting-point than to be forced underground where tracking and monitoring becomes so much more difficult. Also, second tier commanders - those who are more directly
involved with fomenting hatred and plotting terror, may be drawn out into the
open.
Bomb threats have been made by radical Islamists against
members of the Royal Family during celebrations on Saturday
commemorating the capitulation of Japan in WW2. Ultimately, they were unfounded, but their very existence is the terrorists' main weapon, to try to make people afraid. Is it possible, I wonder, that
the timing of Choudary's arrest is not accidental?
The Brits may only tolerate their Royal family sometimes, but
if such an attack took place, the consequences for the perpetrators and
indeed anyone suspected of being the least bit radical would be catastrophic
and it would change the British attitude to Islam and its involvement in the Middle East crisis, perhaps for
ever.
The British National Anthem has a number of verses, often
forgotten and rarely sung. Verse Two goes like this...
O
Lord our God arise,
Scatter her enemies,
And make them fall:
Confound
their politics,
Frustrate their knavish tricks,
On Thee our hopes we
fix:
God save us all.
Knavish tricks. Quite so.
No comment on the individual, but the larger question remains for all "freedom loving democracies." Where to draw the line between free speech and "incitement" or "sedition." Here across the pond we have developed a rigorous state apparatus for pursuing and "neutralizing" real and "perceived" threats to the state. McCarthyism, black-lists, assassinations? All in defense of a system that is inherently biased and unfair to the masses of human beings within and without "the realm." Modern Anti-insurgency doctrine (developed primarily by the British as their empire crumbled in the post WW2 era) calls for "weed and seed." We are good at weeding but I do not see much of the "seeding." One of the disadvantages of having an Empire that the "sun never set on" is the fact that it results in getting the worst ideas abroad along with the best. Homegrown "terrorists" have always been with us. Political action is sometimes rooted in violence. Caesar was killed by his political enemies in broad daylight. Live by the sword, die by the sword. As long as we in the west continue to hold the hammer in our hands and treat every problem like a nail, we will continue to get the response from our political enemies that resembles our methods. Dialogue and example are what is required here. An end to exploitation of powerless people in the world for commercial benefits, ie "modern imperialism" will be a far greater tool in ending the violence than more violence. We have tried the other way. Reaching out to the reasonable elements in the region will provide better results. Aside from the obvious consequences of radicalizing "moderates" continuing to bang the war drums only emboldens those who represent the worst of our societies. Time for more of what Abraham Lincoln called "the better angels of our nature." And then he was assassinated.
ReplyDeleteI had to look up schadenfreude, but now understand fully. I share your schadenfreude.
ReplyDeleteBruce :}