|
You're no Jack Reacher, son. That's for sure. |
Going to the cinema in France is not burdensome. Good films - or those they think will make a lot of money - are in English, VO for ‘version originale’
means that you get to see the same stuff in Les Halles as you do on Sunset
Boulevard. I had promised myself that
the latest offering in the Bourne franchise would be worth the price of a
ticket. How very misguided of me. The ‘franchise’
element was the first mistake. It was tarnished with yellow edges and the paint
almost peeled off the characters, Rachel Weisz (Cambridge, where else?) notwithstanding. There’s really
a time to say ‘enough’ and much as the Indiana Jones films ran their course, so
these have as well. The firework that is Jason Bourne burns brightly but for a
very limited period and over a billion earned is more than dreams of avarice
for a film producer. In conclusion, this film is the strangest sequel to come
out of the Hollywood studio system in a very long time. It's a product of
shallow studio greed and staggering creative ineptitude. Let’s hope they’ll
have learned their lesson and not be tempted by prequels, more sequels or
remakes. For a very long time.
|
Very mumsie, Kate... |
By contrast, I spun the DVD player around something much more
interesting the other day. ’Little Children’ directed by Todd Field (‘In The
Bedroom’) was made in 2006 and stars Kate Winslet whose thirtysomethingness is
beginning to peep nicely through her characters. In summary, it’s the adults
who are the ‘little children’, we are presented with a story about suburbia with all its antiseptic
whispers, gestures and textures, involving disappointed partners, infidelity and guilt, lost
love, passion and a sad, weak child molester. Its characters - even the
narcissistic ones - were drawn with compassion, their follies almost become our
own and their desires seem as vast as
the sky. You warm to almost all of them, despite painful flaws. I found it smart, disturbing and
the best satire I’d seen since ‘American Beauty’. It was a literary exercise as
well and I found myself wondering whether I was at the movies or watching a
play. Voice-over narration, a kind of third-person-omnipotent, holds together a
rather slow midsection well. The film recovers nicely in the final part,
however with an ending both predictable yet freshly conclusive. Richly textured
and nuanced, I liked it.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.