I’m not
cross. I’m not really very angry or outraged. Except in the deeper places in my
soul where I am allowed to smash things and vent my rage on ideas where it won’t
matter very much. What is causing this wanton internal vandalism? I have been
reading opinions, persuasive, eloquently phrased, but personal, hence demeaning
and unnecessary. A friend posted on a well-known social networking site which
of itself was quite inoffensive, but the threads where it led turned out to be
bile-filled and in some cases, hateful, vituperative and misleading. The theme was, inevitably, interfaith
dialogue. I have no problem with the concept, but its proponents all too
frequently seek domination of ideas , a logic unassailable, an argument so
slickly presented that the opposition can do nothing but curl up submissively
and simply give in to its own intellectual extermination and replacement by
something else more culturally and morally attuned to the frequencies of
present-day life.
A bus full of Israeli tourists was blown up in Bulgaria. Lives were lost and various organizations blamed. This occurred because rhetoric and persuasion has a habit of snowballing into actions which are ultimately counterproductive, violent and destructive. Were this the only course open to us, would it not just be simpler to abandon all pretence at religious belief altogether, bowing down to the logic of the New Atheists, people like Sam Harris and Richard Dawkins, who aim is to inspire us all with the hope that all religions might soon join the dinosaurs in extinction? At the other extreme, television preachers still fill our ears with their bombast, certain that the glory of their “true church” will never pass from the earth. I don’t know about that but I’m not convinced.
A bus full of Israeli tourists was blown up in Bulgaria. Lives were lost and various organizations blamed. This occurred because rhetoric and persuasion has a habit of snowballing into actions which are ultimately counterproductive, violent and destructive. Were this the only course open to us, would it not just be simpler to abandon all pretence at religious belief altogether, bowing down to the logic of the New Atheists, people like Sam Harris and Richard Dawkins, who aim is to inspire us all with the hope that all religions might soon join the dinosaurs in extinction? At the other extreme, television preachers still fill our ears with their bombast, certain that the glory of their “true church” will never pass from the earth. I don’t know about that but I’m not convinced.
Most symbols celebrate
success, Coca Cola, Nike, Microsoft. The evidence of the success of these
enterprises dances in our consciousness; at the sound of their names, type face
and colour fly instantly to mind. These symbols proclaim a message we are
always hungry for, namely, that more is better. Every symbol that pleases us
signifies that this thing has succeeded – has climbed over – superseded
something else. More! Larger, sweeter, higher, quieter, better! We seem,
as it were, bound and determined, genetically and socially programmed to
struggle for the utmost – wherever that is. But however high things climb, two
more conditions always hold. Firstly, something will always surpass our ‘more’
with its ‘more’ and secondly, eventually, it - or we -
will fall. Every great athlete will hang up his shoes, someone will come along
who can run faster or jump higher. Windows will close. Promotions will cease
and all these symbols will succumb. Is this awful? No, we just think it is, but
it doesn’t follow that fading away is awful. The condition of endless rise and
fall is just the way things are. Yet what we really wanted was heaven. Once,
what could stop us? Not the skies, it seemed. We were Babel builders, heading
higher, higher, running our race with all our strength, all our gift. There’s
blessing in it, surely. But we could not have heaven by straining for it.
Perfection eluded us, even deluded us. Is it real – heaven?
And yet, I do happen to think
that there is one enduring symbol left. The power of the Cross can never be
replaced by something else. Why? The symbol of the Cross represents apparent
failure and extinction. It carries with it a pathway - a way to go whose path
is never barred, whose pitch is not too steep, whose goal is never put behind.
It is the path of giving by going lower. On this path, there is no end but God,
for no matter how low another creature is or has fallen, you, or even I, by the
grace of God, can choose to go down a step lower, to be sent down to serve. It
is not that we always must, but that we always can. This is freedom. It is not
life as we once knew it, but it is the stairway to heaven. It goes down, in the
footsteps of the sent-down man.
How easy it is to say it. How very straightforward a choice. But, going out to find the
seat at the low place; following the example that was set; ceasing to gasp and scrape to save our life and let go, is the hardest thing possible even as an infinite horizon
for freedom and action opens before us. Energy, intelligence, imagination and love will
never exhaust the possibilities for refreshment if we can only discover a way to
kneel for the other in perfecting humility. Down that road, following the
sent-down man, is found the only country in which we are no longer bound and
determined, the only land of the free. In other words, we cease making more of
ourselves. In that act, we begin being made by God; being made human, a being
made in the image of God, the sent-down man. Until heaven and earth pass away,
the sent-down man and his Cross will never pass away, for the way of the Cross
is the only road that has no end but God. This is the only common ground; the
bedrock of interfaith dialogue is not found in lofty pinnacles of logic, but in
the place of grace and service where our intrinsic humanness finds both a
listening ear and a voice.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.