By way of postscript,
I attempted a crude error analysis on the results - each question can be self-weighted so that the result is skewed by up to 20% and discovered that a more generally benevolent approach to the questions - such as one might give after, say, four gins and tonic, changed the profile significantly, shifting the rectangle of self markedly to the south-east. H'm...
It's only a "sad reflection" if one assumes any particular result is a static, rigid truth about the 'real' you.
ReplyDeleteI'm sure there's a whole research project in the Johari Window a la Melancholia; the Johari Window post gin & tonics; and the Johari Window done for me by someone else. Maybe somewhere in the average a sorta-kinda-little-bit- accurate picture might emerge. Of course, the Johari Window isn't intended to measure normal...
You seem as normal as anyone MathMan, save for your predilection for those wretched formulas.
Normal is as normal does. I think. :-)